In this short video Kennedy tells you of his experience. Remember he is a Kennedy and he has brought suits against hundreds of companies in science related matters. In the video you will learn that the CDC is actually a military organization set up to respond against biological warfare. This is why they do not have to test the vaccinations they push and do not test them- the excuse is it would be too time consuming- so they've never really been tested- and I'd submit another plausibly motive is the test results would never yield acceptable statistics- its placebo level stuff or net negative- nothing new drug induced death is about is the 3rd leading cause of death in he US and it is something like 3% of drugs that are more effective than change in the US pharmacopia and most of those are old drugs the patent ran out on- sound like a trust worthy industry? You will learn that Wyth Labs in the 80s went to Democrats and Republicans during the Reagan admin and said vaccines are inherently unsafe and that they were losing $20 for ever $1 they made to suits for vaccine injury so they were getting out of vaccine manufacturing business. Since the pharmaceutic industry was the largest briber of congress (an obvious crime which we need our law to reflect again) they are granted the industry immunity for any harm done by vaccines. This starts to put into perspective why for instance the Surgeon General told the public that a week early in April would be the saddest in most people's lives conjuring nuclear Armageddon. The theory of inoculation where antigens from a person's body that has gotten over a disease and injected into another person of course had some logic. The theory of a vaccine where it was antigens for a disease that would cross immunize for a fatal disease but wasn't actually fatal seems logical and sound. Fine. But is a cross immunization always going to be available for a flu (apparently not) or a weapon? And why are treatments like gamma globulin outlawed- stuff appears to straight up cure allergies but the FDA outlawed its use in this country and does drug busts over it- its just immune milk used by native American's for ever it just raw colostrum taken from for instance organic grass feed cows- its breast milk but they need drug busts for that in CA? And again, there are antivirals, and stem cells and microbiome (what gamma globulin) and CRISPR and all this new stuff but they want to use this old stuff and don't want to prove it safe first cause: just trust them(?) When we're talking about the CDC we're talking about the military and is long history of doing things like giving kids radio active milk etc. Where was the consent? Was it informed? They don't want to ask permission from civilians they just want to force inject which right there should tell you that what they are doing cannot be trusted. And in the case of CA they have pushed through stupid obviously unconstitutional laws with he help of pawn politicians which allow this to be forced on children overriding parental consent possibly because children have a harder time asserting rights as they don't have he same standing. Those laws need to be overturned. If you can be force injected (needle rape) you have been reduced to an it, to property. Its interesting that the same left that is so pro Woman's right to choose (as opposed to adoption) is so incredibly weak on the equivalent of organizational intrusiveness to the point rape when it comes to coerced vaccination and so ignorant about for instance public policy in Japan and their superior outcomes that forgo what should be a last resort approach and limited to oral application and apparently stopped for things like flu. There is another issue with the CDC, by implication as a part of the military it is involved with the development of biological weapons- should it be the one trying to force medicine on people? Notice that the person charged with developing the "warp speed" vaccine program is a former GSK executive and he is accompanied in the process by a 4 star Army General. Look at how intrusive things have become lately with abuses like domestic spying. Is this what we want? Could we trust this? If you don't have a say over what is put in your body you don't have any rights left, this stuff belongs with forced sterilization and forced lobotomy. The starting point can't be that the state is trust worthy in these matters because it is not and can never be.
